For Reviewers
Information for Reviewers
Peer review is central to maintaining the scientific quality, integrity, and credibility of JNPCS.
Scientific rigor
Assess whether the question, design and evidence support the conclusions.
Methodological quality
Evaluate study design, analysis and reporting against the relevant standards.
Interpretation and limitations
Judge whether interpretation is proportionate and limitations are acknowledged.
Constructive feedback
Provide clear, respectful comments the authors can act on.
Confidentiality
Manuscripts under review are confidential. Do not share, discuss or use their contents.
Conflicts of interest
Declare any conflict before accepting an invitation; decline when one exists.
Review workflow
- Invitation
- Acceptance
- Review
- Recommendation
- Editorial Decision
Reviewers are invited by editors, who have access to registered accounts. To be considered as a reviewer, register an account and contact the editorial office.